BETA ZEN
User talk:Cdjp1
Texto da Wikipédia (en), licença CC BY-SA. O BETARUBI mostra o verbete inteiro nesta página — a leitura não continua fora do site.
Source verification
Could you please provide an ISBN number for the source you've added here. I was unable to find it in WorldCat. --15:40, 6 August 2026 (UTC) bender235 (talk) 15:40, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- As the edit summary explains, it is from the main Apartheid article. You will need to ask whoever added it into that article originally if you want to know what the ISBN is, as I do not know. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 16:11, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Good source for Finnish historical rank insignia
It is in Finnish though. Creuzbourg (talk) 16:42, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
Assistance
Hi Cdjp1, would you mind please taking a look over some recent edits to British naval ranks during WW1 at the Comparative officer ranks of World War I article. I suspect they are incorrect and should be reverted but I am no expert.
Also, I have a feeling that our friend who likes to introduce subtle vandalism to rank articles might be back in town since I had to remove a flurry of unusual edits at United States Army enlisted rank insignia of World War II. You may recall our previous discussion at User talk:Skjoldbro/Archive 3#Please help sift through vandalism where this went unchecked for many months before we noticed and had to do a lot of checking, so please do keep an eye out. Dgp4004 (talk) 14:50, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- I can't comment as to if there is any relation to prior matters, but based on the sources we cite, and Coleman (2009) Vol I. (my go to for RN ranks and insignia), the prior layout seems to be the correct one. It is not a surprise someone would make the changes that were made in good faith, as it seems more "logical", but the real world is always as logical as we would like. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 15:53, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
Comparative officer ranks of World War I
Dear Cdjp1, the changes I made cannot be classified as errors; on the contrary, they correct the previously misaligned rank hierarchy. The sequence "Second Lieutenant – Lieutenant – Captain – Major – Lieutenant Colonel – Colonel" becomes "Midshipman – Sub-Lieutenant – Lieutenant – Lieutenant Commander – Commander – Captain" in the Royal Navy. If you have any doubts, simply check the page on Royal Navy ranks; you will see that this is the correct rank sequence for both World War I and II. ~2026-43385-15 (talk) 16:16, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- I advise you read the sources, and the Wikipedia article you suggested I read, as it actually goes against your changes. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 16:45, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
Dear Cdjp1, I have consulted numerous articles and pages to research the ranks and hierarchies of the British Army and Royal Navy before, during, and after World War I. All these sources confirm the equivalence between a "Major" and a "Lieutenant Commander"—not between a "Major" and a "Commander"; it is the rank of "Lieutenant Colonel" that corresponds to "Commander." Therefore, the columns and rows in the World War I rank comparison chart appear to be incorrect or misaligned. In any case, rest assured that I will no longer edit the page, as every time I make a change, the work I do for the Wikipedia community gets reverted. ~2026-43385-15 (talk) 19:33, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
Organized Labour September Editing Event
You're invited to join the Organized Labour community editing event, a cross-wiki event taking place throughout September 2026!
The campaign brings together Wikimedians interested in improving coverage of organised labour, workers, trade unions, and labour history. We have confirmed collaborations with Wikipedia language editions in English, Dutch, Persian, Serbo-Croatian and French. If you want to add other language editions or other wiki projects you are strongly encouraged to do so! This event spans geography and languages!
This is a one-time invitation. You're receiving it because you previously signed a petition related to Wiki Workers United (WWU). We hope you'll join us!
Royal Tongan Marines
Hello Cdjp1,
Request correction of your Edits,
1, HMAF Royal Tongan Marines is not referred to being a "Marine Corps" It is always referred to as Royal Tongan Marines, 2, HMAF Royal Tongan Marines does not currently have a Support Platoon, Its currently has a RTM CHQ and 3 RTM Platoons,(They do not have Mortars or AT Weopons, Recon and Signals are carried by each of the elements of RTM} 3, Tongan military history goes back many centuries prior to Europeans bought Christianity to the Tongan Island, Tonga was a powerful thalassocracy and Tongan Warriors conducted Amphibious Warfare on the Coasts of Fiji, Niue Solomon, New Caledonia and Samoa, The Predecessor to the HMAF Royal Tongan Marines, translated to Warriors that cross the Seas/Great waters ( basically Naval Infantry or Marines in English speak of the Pacific from around 500 AD).
Request you undo some of your editing,
Yours Kindly Motoed Motoed (talk) 06:41, 25 August 2026 (UTC)
- Considering most of what you refer to are not information I added, but reversions to remove LLM additions, I suggest you actually find who first added the information. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 07:49, 25 August 2026 (UTC)
- Hello Cdjp1,
- Did you not Add:
- Marine Corps?
- Support Platoon? And,
- Did you not Deleted
- The abridged Tonga military History going back 1500 Years?
- Request you undo some of your editing,
- Yours Kindly Motoed Motoed (talk) 08:58, 25 August 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Reverting and Wikipedia:Citation needed -- Cdjp1 (talk) 09:14, 25 August 2026 (UTC)