Archive

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
1,313		Holden Caulfield (talk)	Add sources
3		Michael Tansi Memorial Secondary School, Aguleri (talk)	Add sources
338		Arthur Freed (talk)	Add sources
139		Aba, Nigeria (talk)	Add sources
93		BIMM University (talk)	Add sources
39		Aguata (talk)	Add sources
12		St. Patrick's College, Jaffna (talk)	Cleanup
4		Joseph Adebowale Atanda (talk)	Cleanup
20		Ogere Remo (talk)	Cleanup
13		Joseph Shanahan (talk)	Expand
106		Philosophy of love (talk)	Expand
12		Issues in the 2023 Nigerian presidential election (talk)	Expand
45		Eket (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,924		Austin Powers (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,226		Rapture (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
127		Artemis Crock (talk)	Merge
33		Asian relations with Northeast India (talk)	Merge
7		Bell Circles II (talk)	Merge
8		John Anyogu (talk)	Wikify
45		Aladura (talk)	Wikify
781		Christian eschatology (talk)	Wikify
3		Reverend M.O Dada (talk)	Orphan
6		Paul Nwosu (talk)	Orphan
2		Monkey dey work, baboon dey chop (talk)	Orphan
8		George Basden (talk)	Stub
4		Donatus Edet Akpan (talk)	Stub
14		Anglican Province of the Niger (talk)	Stub
3		Nobregaea latinervis (talk)	Stub
476		Allu Sirish (talk)	Stub
3		Constantine Coronini (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:47, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 51, 2025)

Request for clarification on AfC Marc P. and Timothy T Rejections

Hello SafariScribe, Thank you for reviewing my recent submissions. I'd like to respectfully request clarification on two rejections where I believe the sourcing demonstrates significant coverage beyond passing mentions, as required by WP:GNG.

''Marc E. Polymeropoulos'

The draft included sources that provide substantial, in-depth coverage of Polymeropoulos as the primary subject:

GQ Magazine (October 2020): Feature-length profile by Julia Ioffe specifically about Polymeropoulos and his Havana Syndrome experience – not a passing mention, but a multi-thousand-word investigative feature with him as the central subject

NBC News (Ken Dilanian, December 2020): Extended profile piece titled "CIA officer suffered crippling symptoms in Moscow. Was it 'Havana Syndrome'?" – again, Polymeropoulos is the primary subject

CBS News (Catherine Herridge, June 2021): Television interview and profile piece with Polymeropoulos as the featured subject

NPR (Greg Myre, October 2020): Profile piece where Polymeropoulos is the primary subject, not merely mentioned

CIA Studies in Intelligence (December 2021): Book review of his HarperCollins-published book These are not passing mentions but substantial coverage in reliable, independent sources where Polymeropoulos is the central subject. The Havana Syndrome coverage alone – where he became the public face of the issue – represents significant independent coverage in multiple tier-1 outlets. Could you clarify what additional sourcing would be required? I'm unclear how feature profiles in GQ, NBC, CBS, and NPR fail to meet the "significant coverage" threshold.

'Timothy Thibault

This subject received substantial national news coverage in August–September 2022 when whistleblower allegations were made public by Senator Chuck Grassley:

CBS News (August 31, 2022): "Timothy Thibault, top-level FBI agent under fire for role in Hunter Biden investigation, resigns" – substantial article with Thibault as primary subject

Newsweek (August 30, 2022): "Who is Timothy Thibault? FBI Agent Behind Hunter Biden Probe Retires" – explanatory profile piece

ABC News affiliates: Coverage of his departure and the whistleblower allegations

Washington Times (August 29-30, 2022): Multiple articles with Thibault as primary subject

Congressional records: Senator Grassley's formal letters to DOJ/FBI specifically about Thibault's alleged conduct (May and July 2022)

FBI Director Christopher Wray's Senate testimony specifically addressing allegations against Thibault Thibault became a significant news figure in his own right – covered extensively across multiple outlets as the central subject of whistleblower allegations, congressional inquiries, and his subsequent departure from the FBI. This appears to meet WP:BIO1E for individuals notable for a single event that received substantial coverage. --- I'm genuinely trying to understand the notability threshold here. If feature profiles in major publications (GQ, NBC, CBS, Newsweek) don't constitute "significant coverage," could you point me toward examples of what would? I want to ensure any resubmissions meet the standard. Thank you for your time. Bladerunner24 (talk) 17:20, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi @SafariScribe:, just following up on my November 29 request for clarification above when you have a chance. I want to make sure any resubmission meets the standard. Thanks! Bladerunner24 (talk) 00:21, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

@Bladerunner24, please I will reply tonight. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:24, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks!

Looking forward to hearing your feedback Bladerunner24 (talk) 19:48, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

@Bladerunner24, I have accepted Timothy Thibault after seeing WP:SIGCOV but have doubts with accepting Steven M. D'Antuono, whose notability is not yet defined. I mean he worked as an FBI agent and a little testimony he gave doesn't make him notable; I am not also certain to say it's a WP:BLP1E case. Jay I. Bratt is also not notable and been "the Chief of the Counterintelligence and Export Control Section (CES) in the National Security Division, and later served as Counselor to Special Counsel Jack Smith, acting as the lead attorney in the classified documents prosecution of Donald Trump" doesn't make him notable. Other details in the article were about his retirement and those doesn't add too. I also left some comments in the draft. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:02, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for accepting Thibault!

On D'Antuono — respectfully, it's more than "a little testimony":

Whitmer kidnapping plot: SAC Detroit during what BuzzFeed called "one of the most important domestic terrorism investigations in a generation"

NBC News (David Rohde, Sept 2024): Feature piece with D'Antuono giving on-the-record interviews as the primary subject — not passing mentions

January 6: Public spokesman for the FBI's Capitol investigation, multiple press conferences

This is leadership of two major FBI investigations, not a single event.

Would strengthening the Whitmer sourcing help? Bladerunner24 (talk) 17:22, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Those does not sum up notability for me. Well, if you wish to resubmit it, fine. But another editor will look into it then. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:27, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me. I'll consider resubmitting for another reviewer's perspective. Bladerunner24 (talk) 17:28, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

@SafariScribe: Hi, just checking in on my December 4 question about D'Antuono. Bladerunner24 (talk) 01:29, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Charles Soludo

Hi @SafariScribe, I noticed that one or more recent edits you made on the Charles Soludo page did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. Thanks! Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 12:26, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Charles Soludo, you may be blocked from editing.

This is your second warning. Initially, I admonished you about including edit summaries, and you ignored this. Instead, you proceeded to revert my work without bothering to explain why. If you persist in this non-collaborative and rude manner of editing, you may be sanctioned for disruptiveness. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 03:30, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

@Revirvlkodlaku, I am sorry I didn't inform you before reverting your edits, but it's also disrespectful to revert my edits with a warning of a "so-called lack of edit summary", perhaps the problem you see therein is that what was added may not have "solely" agree with your views, if that's so anyways. Well, I am working to expand that article as so many things are missing, likewise other Nigerian governor's pages. But since you've decided that you'll "allegedly censor" the article, fine, I will work on another. But I do advise that you read again what I added and tell how it is bad. Sometimes, it is important to let the editor of that area to edit the article and though I may not, you may then watch out for any puff; that's collaboration. If you do be willing to revert your edit, it will be wonderful, and when I am done adding few things, I will easily tidy up the article and when you read it and it doesn't suit well, you copyedit it. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:23, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Are you suggesting that I reverted your edits purely for lack of an edit summary? Because I'm pretty sure I never did that, so either I'm misunderstanding you, or you're omitting important details regarding my revert(s).

I'm struggling to understand your English, so let me just say this: when you hit "publish" on a page, it's fair game for someone like me to come along and review changes you've made. If your work isn't done and the edit isn't ready for mainspace, you shouldn't hit publish but instead, you should continue working on the page in your sandbox. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 12:04, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

No need for any argument, but I saw what you did to the article. Thank you! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:00, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Your comment

...from here, One doesn't start to use a particular source because "they" think it's reliable... Mind you, this is no longer about the source, hahaha.

One actually starts to use a particular source because they think it is reliable, so basically the statement is the opposite of reality in the sense that, as an experienced editor (one of the things that makes me experienced is my understanding of the policies guiding reliable sources on English Wikipedia); I know whether or not a particular source is usable on English Wikipedia, or is reliable. If, with my knowledge of reliability, I think it is reliable, then I go ahead and use it, right? This is just the reality; it happens with any other editor. I cannot start asking about the reliability of ALL sources I have been using so far in my editing career; I just need to know what English Wikipedia accepts.

Now, the point is, if you now find a source and think it is not really reliable, then you who thinks so will have to ask for clarity at WP:RSN, as opposed to every editor asking about the reliability of every source they come across. So, whoever that another editor [that] may not be in support of the reliability of a source is, they have to be the one to ask for clarity at WP:RSN, not the editor that comes across it and uses it at least with their knowledge of reliability.

Hope this helps. Regards, Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:04, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Beware, Soul Brother for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beware, Soul Brother is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beware, Soul Brother until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Docmoates (talk) 19:48, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

@Docmoates, I have replied there. Thanks! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:19, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
202		None of This Is True (talk)	Add sources
44		Executive Council of Lagos State (talk)	Add sources
25		Nkpor (talk)	Add sources
31		Ogidi, Anambra (talk)	Add sources
3,457		Prussia (talk)	Add sources
4		Chimezie Ikeazor (talk)	Add sources
4		Wanda Leopold (talk)	Cleanup
6		Bunmi Olusona (talk)	Cleanup
66		Yenagoa (talk)	Cleanup
1,837		Tomi Lahren (talk)	Expand
6		2019 in Nigeria (talk)	Expand
19		2023 Bayelsa State gubernatorial election (talk)	Expand
42		Mbaise (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
64		Adamawa Emirate (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
4		Should I Really Do It? (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
9		Oregon Route 47 (talk)	Merge
7		Christian C. Sanderson Museum (talk)	Merge
9		Sunnydale High Yearbook (talk)	Merge
3		2015 Imo State gubernatorial election (talk)	Wikify
4		2015 Taraba State gubernatorial election (talk)	Wikify
10		Kwara State College of Education, Ilorin (talk)	Wikify
2		Chinua Achebe Poetry and Essay Anthology (talk)	Orphan
5		Sa'adatu Modibbo Kawu (talk)	Orphan
3		Abdulkadir Aliyu Mahe (talk)	Orphan
9		Unity Party (Israel) (talk)	Stub
4		Lucifer (2019 Nigerian film) (talk)	Stub
15		Anambra State House of Assembly (talk)	Stub
18		Anambra East (talk)	Stub
6		Survival of Jelili (talk)	Stub
29		Bob-Manuel Udokwu (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:04, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2025)

December thanks

story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in December! - The 1715 Advent Bach cantata translates to "Prepare the ways", - listen to quite stunning music if you haven't ;) - "places" take you to Copenhagen. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:00, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi SafariScribe. Thank you for your work on We Should All Be Feminists (talk). Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:GNG. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:44, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello SafariScribe, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Abishe (talk) 07:07, 25 December 2025 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 07:07, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

New pages patrol January–February 2026 Backlog drive

January–February 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
New Pages Patrol is hosting a one-time, two-month experimental backlog drive aimed at reducing the backlog. This will be a combo drive: both articles and redirects will earn points. The drive will run from 1 January to 28 February 2026. The drive is divided into two phases. Participants may take part in either phase or across both phases, depending on availability. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled during the drive. Two-month drive-exclusive barnstars will be awarded to eligible participants. Each article review earns 1 point, while each redirect review earns 0.2 points. Streak awards will be granted based on consistently meeting weekly point thresholds. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in participating? Sign up here.
You are receiving this message because you are a New Pages Patrol reviewer. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself from here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
23		Uche Okeke (talk)	Add sources
17		Lewis Nkosi (talk)	Add sources
51		Gbenga Daniel (talk)	Add sources
250		Art for art's sake (talk)	Add sources
2		Azanwi Nchami (talk)	Add sources
240		Ogun State (talk)	Add sources
15		Kokoro Terada (talk)	Cleanup
87		Anti-Armenian sentiment (talk)	Cleanup
81		Igbo culture (talk)	Cleanup
91		Blockade of Nagorno-Karabakh (talk)	Expand
17		Bokura ga Ita (film) (talk)	Expand
1,216		Republic of Artsakh (talk)	Expand
30		Enugu State University of Science and Technology (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
78		2016 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
69		Brigid Brophy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
5		Pueyrredón (Line B Buenos Aires Underground) (talk)	Merge
19		FBI Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate (talk)	Merge
12		Protests against conscription of yeshiva students (talk)	Merge
118		Armenia–Azerbaijan border crisis (2021–present) (talk)	Wikify
946		Nagorno-Karabakh conflict (talk)	Wikify
14		From a Crooked Rib (talk)	Wikify
3		Kiru Taye (talk)	Orphan
10		The Tiny Things Are Heavier (talk)	Orphan
3		All Shades of Iberibe (talk)	Orphan
6		Destination Biafra (talk)	Stub
8		Hopes and Impediments (talk)	Stub
5		Gabriela Babnik (talk)	Stub
17		Chike and the River (talk)	Stub
7		Ada Udechukwu (talk)	Stub
3		The Arrangements (short story) (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:25, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2026)

January 2026

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. You wrote, If you are talking like that, then you are not "worthy" for any user right or being an editor, even. which is beyond the pale for civil editing. I suggest you strike it immediately. EducatedRedneck (talk) 15:19, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

I see that there is a clear, a very clear misconception between being logical and outright insult. Why didn't you warn me pasting the full writeup and not one cut-off stuff? When someone reads it, they will know what I meant and that I didn't attack anyone. And please manage our warning templates/tags, that they may be considered serious. That's funny, right? Cheers! SafariScribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:41, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

If there's a misconception, it's yours; you can insult someone while being logical. I pasted only a quote because that was the relevant part. If you feel the context around it changes its meaning, you may post that, or a diff to your edit, but from what I saw, the context just makes it worse, as you spoke with great grandiosity about how, if passing bad drafts at AfC is disruptive, you intend to disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point, the point I think being that everyone should be able to publish their draft? As for templates, editors are supposed to warn others when they break site rules. EducatedRedneck (talk) 19:06, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2026)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
604		Haitian Creole (talk)	Add sources
33		A Dance of the Forests (talk)	Add sources
128		Obafemi Awolowo University (talk)	Add sources
23		2023 Nigerian elections (talk)	Add sources
2,227		São Tomé and Príncipe (talk)	Add sources
58		Sporting Lagos F.C. (talk)	Add sources
42		Delta State University, Abraka (talk)	Cleanup
41		Mark Doty (talk)	Cleanup
5		Archdiocese of Port Moresby (talk)	Cleanup
3,894		Javier Milei (talk)	Expand
125		2019 Nigerian general election (talk)	Expand
518		Lagos State (talk)	Expand
109		John Kerry 2004 presidential campaign (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,053		Dr. Teeth and the Electric Mayhem (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
88		Instrumental rock (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
121		Ministry of Interior (Syria) (talk)	Merge
9		Tropical Depression One (1993) (talk)	Merge
8		MainActor (talk)	Merge
5		2017 Anambra State gubernatorial election (talk)	Wikify
51		George W. Bush 2004 presidential campaign (talk)	Wikify
13		Bruce Weigl (talk)	Wikify
7		Seamoriow Football Club (talk)	Orphan
3		Marco Martiniello (talk)	Orphan
4		Ayodeji Ariyo Gbeleyi (talk)	Orphan
12		Zikora (talk)	Stub
3		Ayanna Dyette (talk)	Stub
20		Uche Nnaji (talk)	Stub
3		Becoming Abigail (talk)	Stub
8		2003 Anambra State gubernatorial election (talk)	Stub
12		Kongi's Harvest (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:51, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

January 2026

		The Good Article Rescue Barnstar
		Thank you for your efforts in preserving Mongrels (TV series) as a Good Article! Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:08, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

CG5 finally got accepted, but why didn't it the first time?

Hi SafariScribe,

It's Jibblesnark. I recently saw that the article for CG5 got accepted, which is great, though I'm wondering something: why didn't get accepted the first few times they were submitted, especially when you declined it when I submitted it the last time before it got accepted? Could you please look over the revision history and see why you think that is? Not pressuring you or anything, I'm just curious and kind of baffled. Thank you in advance.

Jibblesnark86 (talk) 19:31, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

@Jibblesnark86, drafts have histories. When a draft was created, it doesn't mean the subject isn't notable, rather it is how the draft was written and cited by sources. Unfortunately, I wasn't the one who accepted the draft but after I saw some revisions, I would have equally done the same. Additions like adding musical charts which you did as well as the removal of unreliable sources like YouTube by Greshthegreat. I hope that helps? SafariScribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:59, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Ok, that does actually help a lot. I'm sorry to pester you like this because I know you weren't the person who accepted the article, but I was just curious about this in general. Thank you very much. Jibblesnark86 (talk) 21:13, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on List of awards and honours received by Chinua Achebe

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of awards and honours received by Chinua Achebe, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:04, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Suggestion

You approved this, her org; this could be notable too. ~2026-10937-5 (talk) 11:06, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Peter Obi

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Peter Obi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Feedback on the Cardtonic Article.

Hi SafariScribe,

I trust you’re doing well.

You recently reviewed my article on "Draft:Cardtonic" and you left a feedback saying "the draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article."

I have taken my time to go through the sources again based on your note and I am honestly not really sure which of the references are failing the notability test. To be honest, all the sources I used are independent and reliable. They also talk about the subject in depth. As for the interviews, those were used for general background information and all the important claims like user numbers were backed with secondary coverage.

Well i am human after all, and maybe am missing something, so here is my question: i wanted to ask if you could point out which specific sources you think i should remove or replace? So i dont just keep guess and repeating the same mistake over and over again.

And yeah, thanks for taking the time to review my article. I look forward to your response.

Here is the link to the article: Draft:Cardtonic Teewrites (talk) 21:42, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi SafariScribe, happy new year.

I just wanted to follow up in case you missed my message from December. I sent you a note about the Cardtonic draft. I have attached the same note i sent earlier below.

---

"Hi SafariScribe,

I trust you’re doing well.

You recently reviewed my article on "Draft:Cardtonic" and you left a feedback saying "the draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article."

I have taken my time to go through the sources again based on your note and I am honestly not really sure which of the references are failing the notability test. To be honest, all the sources I used are independent and reliable. They also talk about the subject in depth. As for the interviews, those were used for general background information and all the important claims like user numbers were backed with secondary coverage.

Well i am human after all, and maybe am missing something, so here is my question: i wanted to ask if you could point out which specific sources you think i should remove or replace? So i dont just keep guess and repeating the same mistake over and over again.

And yeah, thanks for taking the time to review my article. I look forward to your response.

Here is the link to the article: Draft:Cardtonic"

---

Looking forward to your response.

Thanks a lot. Teewrites (talk) 15:49, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

I will look into it and get back to you. SafariScribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:51, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi SafariScribe,

i hope you’re doing well.

Just following up to see if you have had the time to check this.

Thanks. Teewrites (talk) 12:07, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

December 2025 AfC backlog drive award

		The Invisible Barnstar
		This is awarded to SafariScribe for accumulating more than 50 points during the December 2025 AfC backlog drive. Your dedication and contributions to Wikipedia's content review process were crucial in reviewing over 9,000 drafts during the drive. Thank you for your participation and helping to reduce the backlog! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:40, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2026)