BETA SAÚDE
User talk:Rtkat3
Texto da Wikipédia (en), licença CC BY-SA. O BETARUBI mostra o verbete inteiro nesta página — a leitura não continua fora do site.
Welcome to my Talk page! If you have any comments or questions, send them here. Below is my archive pages.
Nomination of List of Batman Beyond characters for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Batman Beyond characters, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Batman Beyond characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
February 2026
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Animalympics, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 03:26, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- This is my reply to @Doniago. In my defense, the cast list of Animalympics were restructured so that each of the characters not mentioned in the synopsis would have their bios listed and what animal each of them are. Plus, the alligator in question didn't have his competitor that he gave up a medal for listed and the intro listed examples of the characters sounding like certain sports-related characters. Did I leave anything out? Rtkat3 (talk) 03:37, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- You left out the fact that you can't claim that a character in the film is based on a real individual without citing a source that supports that claim. DonIago (talk) 03:39, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- This is my reply to @Doniago. It might take some time to find the worthy sources for the individual base-off, but do you still not want the animal descriptions there? Rtkat3 (talk) 03:41, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- I don't think I had a problem with the rest of it, though I'd recommend you review WP:FILMCAST to ensure you're not bloating that section with non-principal roles. I didn't look too closely because the claims I mentioned above jumped out at me. DonIago (talk) 03:43, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- This is my reply to @Doniago. Of course each of the characters did have a part in each of the segments. If you have seen this movie, perhaps they can be separated into their own plot sub-sections at some point. If you haven't seen this movie, I'm sure one of the streaming services might help you out. What do you think? Rtkat3 (talk) 03:46, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- I have seen the film, and your comment makes me concerned that you may feel a need to list every character rather than focusing on the main roles. DonIago (talk) 03:51, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- This is my reply to @Doniago. That thing is noted, but all of the characters are voiced by four actors. If you want to restore the bios for those that you would consider major, you can do that. Rtkat3 (talk) 03:52, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- I think the voice cast listing as it currently stands is satisfactory in that regard, though I'd be open to seeing it reformatted to add a bit more information, such as sourced content regarding who the characters are based on. You might benefit from asking this at the article's Talk page rather than here. Also, there's no need to @ me every time you reply. This page is on my watchlist. DonIago (talk) 03:55, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- This is my reply to @Doniago. That thing is noted, but all of the characters are voiced by four actors. If you want to restore the bios for those that you would consider major, you can do that. Rtkat3 (talk) 03:52, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- I have seen the film, and your comment makes me concerned that you may feel a need to list every character rather than focusing on the main roles. DonIago (talk) 03:51, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- This is my reply to @Doniago. Of course each of the characters did have a part in each of the segments. If you have seen this movie, perhaps they can be separated into their own plot sub-sections at some point. If you haven't seen this movie, I'm sure one of the streaming services might help you out. What do you think? Rtkat3 (talk) 03:46, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- I don't think I had a problem with the rest of it, though I'd recommend you review WP:FILMCAST to ensure you're not bloating that section with non-principal roles. I didn't look too closely because the claims I mentioned above jumped out at me. DonIago (talk) 03:43, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- This is my reply to @Doniago. It might take some time to find the worthy sources for the individual base-off, but do you still not want the animal descriptions there? Rtkat3 (talk) 03:41, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- You left out the fact that you can't claim that a character in the film is based on a real individual without citing a source that supports that claim. DonIago (talk) 03:39, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Supergiant (comics) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supergiant (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:33, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Black Order (comics) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Order (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:38, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Ebony Maw for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebony Maw until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:08, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
A fox for you!
Thanks for that revert on List of characters in the Zootopia franchise! I didn't want to risk edit-warring...
Obsidian the Fox 01:38, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
- This is my reply to @Obsidian the Fox. You're welcome. Now you know. Rtkat3 (talk) 01:40, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Fabian Stankowicz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fabian Stankowicz, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabian Stankowicz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Amygdala (character) for deletion
The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amygdala (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.Is there a proper list/discussion about what websites are reliable sources for comic books?
I've been trying to find something like WP:VG/S for the comic book end of things, but I couldn't see anything of that sort actually cooked up. It's made things an interesting ordeal, because while I can argue stuff like AIPT and to a lesser extent Comic Book Resources, I see stuff like Comics Watch cited frequently, which looks more like a fan site than anything. Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:18, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- This is my reply to @Kung Fu Man. I don't know if there is something like that. You should ask any administrators that work in those part of this website. Rtkat3 (talk) 01:56, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
May 2026
Hello, I'm SleepyRedHair. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Joker (Jack Napier), but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 16:13, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Invitation to the newly revitalized Marvel Comics work group!
Hey Rtkat3,
I’ve seen your recent work on many different Marvel-related articles, and I want to say thank you.
A few of us are currently working to revitalize the Marvel Comics work group, and since you're already active in this space, I wanted to see if you'd be interested in joining us. We are currently giving the main project page a massive facelift to make it a much better workspace: updating the resource section, pushing articles for GA that are soon to make their MCU appearence, etc.
If you're interested, you can check out the updated workspace and sign up here: WP:MARVEL
No pressure at all, but let me know if you have any questions. ModlordD (talk) 02:32, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Wizard (DC Comics) for deletion
The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wizard (DC Comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.CosmicMordecai (talk) 23:05, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
Mis-citing policy in AfD
I have noticed that in what seems like nearly every AfD you participate in, you cite WP:PRESERVE as a reason to keep the article. Please stop using PRESERVE as an argument, as WP:DON'T PRESERVE also exists and can easily counter it in literally every instance it is invoked. In both cases, it is subjective and actual evidence is needed to prove whether it should be kept or deleted.
I don't want to start responding with "In the spirit of WP:DON'T PRESERVE, delete", because that wouldn't be mature. But, neither is copy pasting the same WP:VAGUEWAVE argument into every comics AfD. It seems you have created a lot of plot centric articles in the past, but policies around it have changed. Hopefully it only has to go as far as a polite request to stop being disruptive.
As an aside, I AfD'd List of Warcraft locations and List of Warcraft creatures in 2017, but more recently I recreated Azeroth, which seems to be stable and have clear notability, and it covers those aspects to a more reasonable extent thanks to some assistance by another editor. I thought you may be happy to know there turned out to be an alternate place for that information. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 01:54, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- This is my reply to @Zxcvbnm. In my defense, I have been doing the citing in order to have any of their histories and their media appearances preserved for the characters in question. We have to put their media appearance somewhere on this website like the unidentified Insect Queen (whose AFD discussion is up) that appeared in Kite Man: Hell Yeah!. I have mentioned the "We have to put their media appearance somewhere on this website" on some of the AFDs that I have taken part in. Would you want me to mention something like that in an upcoming AFD about a comic book character? I'm just asking for your opinion here. As for your Azeroth comment, you did a good job with it. Perhaps it can be modified with your locations. Outside of this, I was wondering if you would be bothered in the event that someone starts a sister page to Features of the Marvel Universe for DC Universe that is much different from the Draft:Features of the DC Universe started by @MillenniumGeneration (who I have contacted about renaming that draft to Features of the DC Universe (franchise) to avoid confusion and haven't heard back yet). Did I leave anything out? Rtkat3 (talk) 02:15, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- In response, I will say that my main problem is the unjustified "keep" votes and using PRESERVE inappropriately. Suggesting an article be redirected somewhere is nowhere near as bad, but that falls under WP:ATD, not WP:PRESERVE. You may wish to invoke ATD instead in these instances.
- As far as the Features of the Marvel Universe sister page. I don't think I'd be bothered, though I don't think the articles are named very well. I'd prefer List of Marvel Universe concepts and List of DC Universe concepts instead. I always think a list should be named as such, and "features" seems kind of promotional in tone. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:54, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- This is my reply to @Zxcvbnm. So say "in the spirit of "ATD" then! That might help by the next AFD discussion. Right? As for the Marvel and DC part, you can pitch a discussion to have the Marvel one renamed and assist in the development of the latter if you would like. I'm just making a suggestion here. Any chance you might be able to improve Azeroth by doing its known locations in your own words? Rtkat3 (talk) 02:58, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, that would make a lot more sense to say. Regarding Azeroth, there is absolutely a chance I may go back to it later and improve it further. I just wanted to get the article out there, which clearly helped, but there's obviously more to improve like actually inline citing the plot stuff. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:05, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- This is my reply to @Zxcvbnm. So say "in the spirit of "ATD" then! That might help by the next AFD discussion. Right? As for the Marvel and DC part, you can pitch a discussion to have the Marvel one renamed and assist in the development of the latter if you would like. I'm just making a suggestion here. Any chance you might be able to improve Azeroth by doing its known locations in your own words? Rtkat3 (talk) 02:58, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Red Tornado (character) for redirecting to Red Tornado
The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Tornado (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.CosmicMordecai (talk) 04:10, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion
Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 August 11 § Minor DC Comics alien species and races until a consensus is reached. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:27, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
One of...
... the best books of all time, right? Cheers - DVdm (talk) 15:11, 19 August 2026 (UTC)