DYK nomination of Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious (collection)

Hello! Your submission of Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious (collection) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CMD (talk) 05:27, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Eshu (collection) is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Eshu (collection) has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zzz plant -- Zzz plant (talk) 18:39, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Viewing a deleted article

Hi !

I know you're a deletionist, so I figured I'd ask you if I could view an article I stumbled across on The Faith / Void that was deleted a while ago to see if there's useful information on there I could merge or properly cite -- I'm mostly just curious to see what it was (my guess is an under-cited album article stub).

Thank you !

Eugenia ioessa (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Totally unrelated to the album unfortunately, the deleted article is a single line about a band from California. Nothing useful. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:26, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

thanks for checking !

Best, Eugenia ioessa (talk) 00:52, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Eshu (collection) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Eshu (collection) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zzz plant -- Zzz plant (talk) 12:31, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious (collection)

On 17 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious (collection), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tim Burton designed the lighting and invitation for the runway show of the Alexander McQueen collection inspired by his films? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious (collection). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious (collection)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 00:03, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious (collection) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious (collection) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of E mln e -- E mln e (talk) 08:02, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Untitled (collection) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Untitled (collection) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Crystalite13 -- Crystalite13 (talk) 00:48, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Deliverance (collection) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Deliverance (collection) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AllWeKnowOfHeaven -- AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 20:01, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Deliverance (collection) is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Deliverance (collection) has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AllWeKnowOfHeaven -- AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 20:31, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Qursha

Dear PMC,

Just was reading Qursha again and wanted to say hi and thank you for creating the article :). Regards, An emperor ✖ 00:49, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Nice to hear from you, and thanks! ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:55, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Deliverance (collection) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Deliverance (collection) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AllWeKnowOfHeaven -- AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 21:01, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Pong

I pinged you here but I guess the ping failed. Would you be so kind to please take a look? Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 14:37, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Yeah sorry I was at the tail end of a night shift and then went to bed. It looks like the ANI community is handling it now. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:26, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Not in a hurry. Since I pinged you no other admin would be willing to take a look at it so if you can find some spare time at some point in the future... Shouldn't be too difficult because I posted 14 diffs that show a clear pattern of including their company Heidi Health in all sorts of articles. Polygnotus (talk) 02:04, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Since there's no hurry, as I said, it looks like the ANI community is handling it. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:42, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Undeleting a revision

Hi PMC, I'm just messaging you as the first admin I could think of. Could you undelete the old revision of File:"Zebra Killers" mugshots, 1974 - l to r, Manuel Moore, Larry Green, Jessie Lee Cooks, JCX Simon.jpg so I could move it to Wikimedia Commons? It was marked as fair-use but is in fact in the public domain. Best, Bremps... 04:45, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Bremps, sorry for not getting to this sooner. It's now undeleted. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:34, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Refund?

A user is looking for a refund or userfication for the article deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonard Anthony Bracken Jr. I can't recall the process. It's for Lenbracken. Bearian (talk) 01:44, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Done, it's now live at User:Lenbracken/Leonard Anthony Bracken Jr. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:03, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I just saw this and plan to retry by cutting it back while replacing as many links as possible - for example, a link to the NYT website rather than to my scan and posting of the NYT article. Someone else put my name in this article, probably trying to be helpful. I'll be sure to keep it out. Lenbracken (talk) 21:34, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, Premeditated Choas. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Alexander McQueen collections – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for April 17. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 20:48, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Untitled (collection)

On 1 April 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Untitled (collection), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a fashion designer expressed his career frustrations with a golden shower? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Untitled (collection). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Untitled (collection)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 9,354 views (779.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2026 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:35, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

HurricaneZeta^C 00:04, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Untitled (collection) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Untitled (collection) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ArtemisiaGentileschiFan -- ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 00:07, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Untitled (collection) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Untitled (collection) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ArtemisiaGentileschiFan -- ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 12:26, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Voss (collection)

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 7 June 2026. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 2026, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/June 2026. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work! Wehwalt (talk) 01:22, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious (collection) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious (collection) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of E mln e -- E mln e (talk) 14:25, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Promotion of The Horn of Plenty

Congratulations, Premeditated Chaos! The article you nominated, The Horn of Plenty, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, David Fuchs (talk) via FACBot (talk) 23:06, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

• Congratulations on the FAC promotion! Aoba47 (talk) 03:44, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks Aoba, I really appreciate your review/commentary, as always. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:07, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Four Award for The Horn of Plenty

Precious anniversary

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:50, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you today for Voss (Alexander McQueen collection), introduced: "It's late 2000. You've had it up to here with the jerks at LVMH telling you how to run Givenchy, with the press making snarky comments about your weight, and with the whole bloody madhouse of the fashion industry top to tail. Do you quit this all and become an accountant now? Hell no. You're Alexander McQueen, and you're going to channel your rage into the most beautiful showcase of your entire career: Voss. - Combining incredible showpieces, virtuoso staging, and – the biggest middle finger of all – beautifully wearable designs, Voss was McQueen at the top of his game, all killer no filler. I hope this article does it justice."! - I have a FAC open, in case of interest. What do you think of Brich dem Hungrigen dein Brot, BWV 39, - possible? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:34, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

AE action appeal

An AE action you made is being appealed at WP:AE#Arbitration enforcement action appeal by American Angel1. Left guide (talk) 18:19, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Restore request of Lucas Stenhouse

I would like to request to restore the page on draft space so that I can improve the page. Thank you in advance ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 09:28, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, I meant to reply yesterday after fixing the link and got distracted. This is a pretty old deletion. Could you link a few of the new sources that you believe support notability? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:09, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of La Dame Bleue is under review

Your good article nomination of the article La Dame Bleue is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zzz plant -- Zzz plant (talk) 12:24, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of La Dame Bleue has passed

Your good article nomination of the article La Dame Bleue has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zzz plant -- Zzz plant (talk) 20:04, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

deletion of article Alessio Zanelli

I'd like to know why the article has been deleted (notability criteria, cross-references, etc.). Thanks ~2026-34088-10 (talk) 19:16, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

You can see the discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alessio Zanelli. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:44, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of It's Only a Game (collection) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article It's Only a Game (collection) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 21:44, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of It's Only a Game (collection) is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article It's Only a Game (collection) has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 13:43, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of It's Only a Game (collection) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article It's Only a Game (collection) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 15:24, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

A couple redirect requests to Inuit clothing

Hi PMC, there's a couple redirect requests at WP:AFC/R that I think are reasonable but thought I should check with you first given the article is one of the finest FAs in my estimation: (one, Inuit dress, two, Inuit footwear). I think the requestor flubbed the link to the source but not sure it matters. Any issue with either? S0091 (talk) 20:59, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Nah seems reasonable to me, and thank you, that's very kind :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:03, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

I am not sure at this point how I discovered the article but it's a jaw-dropping beautiful article, PMC, It's clear a lot of love and hard work went into it. The redirects are now created. Thank you! S0091 (talk) 21:15, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Ohh you're making me blush. Thank you. It really was a labor of love and probably one of my proudest achievements onwiki. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:18, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Request for deleted wikitext: Steven C. Wade

I am Steven C. Wade, the subject of Steven C. Wade, which was deleted under G11 on 16 May 2020. I am not requesting direct restoration to article space. I would like a copy of the deleted wikitext, or restoration to my userspace, primarily to recover its references. I intend to rewrite it neutrally, I do not specifically recall the article being promotional, but it contained a list of games and projects I had worked on that I can no longer fully reconstruct after many years. My main purpose is to recover that information and the original references. Any new article would be written in a neutral, source-based manner. I will disclose my conflict of interest and submit it through Articles for Creation rather than moving it directly into article space. Sources covering me and my work include: GamesBeat — Midnight comes out of stealth with $7.5M in funding Naavik — Midnight, the AA Web3 Games Consolidator BlockchainGamer.biz — How Midnight is building its Evergreen multiverse GAM3S.GG — Midnight’s Web3 MMORPG Evergreen Would you be willing to provide the deleted source or userfy it for me? Thank you. Jumpingspider (talk) 03:39, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

I'm not inclined to action this, although I'm willing to send you the list of works as a courtesy. The article did read a bit like a CV, not an encyclopedia article. Frankly the sourcing situation isn't good either. GamesBeat is reliable per WP:VGRS, but that article is about the company, not about you. Naavik is a podcast interview with you, we typically don't regard those as a strong contributor to a claim to notability. Same with BockchainGamer.biz which doesn't strike me as all that reliable anyway. Gam3s.gg doesn't look reliable (neither of these last two are listed at VGRS) and the article is about the company, not about you. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:25, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for taking a look. Yes, I would appreciate the list of works as a courtesy—that is the material I was most concerned about losing.

I understand your assessment regarding the article and the sourcing. Thank you again. Jumpingspider (talk) 16:41, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for being cool about it. And who knows, if your project succeeds, maybe you'll blow up and someone else will take up the mantle of writing about you :) I've emailed the list of works. Have a good one! ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, I appreciate both the kindness and your taking the time to send the list.

You may be right. Sometimes the best thing we can do is keep building, try to do good work, and let the story find its way to the right person when the time is right.

Thanks again for your help and for the thoughtful exchange. I hope you have a good one as well. Jumpingspider (talk) 20:56, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Bibliography of Alexander McQueen?

Hey PMC, I was talking to a friend who is interested in Alexander McQueen and they mentioned they were after a new book to read. I checked if we had a Bibliography of Alexander McQueen article and not seeing any, thought I'd compile one from the source sections of your FAs. Thought I'd check with you before doing so to avoid stepping on toes in case there's something I'm missing, to see if you want the page authorship credit for what is really your work, and in case you had any insight on organisation. Whonting (talk) 04:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

I'm planning to do list of works about Alexander McQueen as an FL eventually, yeah, I just haven't gotten there yet. I hate to sound territorial, but...would you mind leaving it to me? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:30, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Yeah of course. Whonting (talk) 05:33, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, so sorry to be that person, I appreciate you being cool about it :) (As a side note, if you want to put your friend in touch with me, I have a difficult to find but "perfectly legitimate" copy of the Wilcox essay book that accompanied the Savage Beauty redux and I'm happy to share.) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:07, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Sorry! This slipped my mind. I'll send you an email now. Whonting (talk) 03:59, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Promotion of The Man Who Knew Too Much (collection)

Congratulations, Premeditated Chaos! The article you nominated, The Man Who Knew Too Much (collection), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 23:06, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Congratulations on the FAC/FA promotion! Aoba47 (talk) 09:32, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks Aoba! ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:44, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Anotha one

Thanks! Time to change my name to DJ Khaled? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:50, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Promotion of Angels and Demons (collection)

Congratulations, Premeditated Chaos! The article you nominated, Angels and Demons (collection), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 23:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Congratulations on the promotion! Aoba47 (talk) 02:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks Aoba! ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:17, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Procedural error at AFD close for Bryan Kohberger

Hi PMC. You still need to close out the AFD at Bryan Kohberger by placing the notice of the close at Talk:Bryan Kohberger and removing the discussion template from that page. It appears you closed out the AFD at the redirect page, Bryan Kohberger (Criminal) instead by accident.4meter4 (talk) 13:16, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

Ah, that's the XfDcloser wonking up, it's supposed to catch that. I'll fix. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:23, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

Deletion of Article

Hi! I would to like question why the article “Battle of Hagoogane (1920)” has been deleted, as i have no even taken part in the discussion yet, it was deleted as i was wriing my response, further more, i was never motified that a discussion was taking place in my talk page, only on the artciles talk page. Samyatilius (talk) 14:31, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

The AfD was open for the standard one-week period and showed a clear consensus for deletion. No editor is guaranteed right of reply at AfD (that is, there is no provision to hold an AfD open until any particular person comments). You were not automatically notified because you are not the article's creator - HabrJeclo was, and they were given the standard automatic notification on their talk page. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:55, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

i see I apologise for the confusion. However, i have significantly added to the discussion but am not the creator so my fault if it isn’t my place to say this but, I wish to restore or reactivate the article discussion as i have complaints of meatpuppetry and a possible sockpuppetry, aswell as the argument raised by the author of the deletion being unbased and false. is there anything i do? any way that i can change the outcome to oppose the decision? Samyatilius (talk) 15:00, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

You can take the discussion to deletion review if you'd like to dispute the outcome. Please be very careful with your accusations of meat/sockpuppetry - you need to have evidence for these or you may be seen as casting aspersions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:02, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

thank you for both of the advice, However, in my suspicion for sockpuppetry, @~2026-45016-01 was tagged for meatpuppetry, was created on 16 of August 2026, Immediately on the same day he somehow finds the deletion discussion, and votes delete by saying “i agree with the points raised above” without any additional contribution.

for my second point, the @Ocelius was created a month ago, creating or contributing to no wikipages other than his sandbox, the only 3 fhanges he made is editing the userpage of the account @Yubudirsi *which took part and voted delete in the deleting discussion*, and removing his vote after the article was deleted. Further more, The user Yubudirsi is connected appearing in the talk page of the person that initiated the deletion discussion, In order to back him in arguments and discussions. See Talk:Somaliland campaign where both users argue for the move of the wikipage to be renamed to the Dervish war *there are many accounts created on the same day of the discussion began there too only to immediately vote and never contribute anything else*, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abbasid expeditions to East Africa, Both users again argue for the same thing and push each other’s argument, for example

“Delete. [I believe Yubudirsi’s extensive input shows why it should be deleted and/or merged with كتاب الزنج (Kitab al-Zanj) as it is mainly a mythological and legend-based account.] Johannes Klarnus-Pettersen (talk) 19:51, 12 March 2026 (UTC)”

infact if one of Replayerr, Johaness Klarnus-Pettersen or Yubudirsi are having a deletion discussion, one or both The other two will almost always back the other, Which is again incredibly odd combined with the obvious sockpuppetry.

i can point out many more examples but i hope these are enough to give u a better understanding of what i mean. Thank you for taking time to listen to this and again, I appreciate your time to suggest alternatives. Samyatilius (talk) 15:29, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

I've self-reverted the close and relisted it for now, pointing to this discussion, and tagged the TA and Ocelius as possible single-purpose accounts. However, just because Yubudirsi and JKP happen to agree with each other and edit in the same topic area does not necessarily substantiate an accusation of meatpuppetry on their part. If you believe they are engaging in socking, please take it to sockpuppet investigations for a proper investigation. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:40, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

thank you, i know it isn’t sufficient but i was pointing out that there argument is not only baseless, but they blindly agree with each other without any real arguments Samyatilius (talk) 15:43, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

If it isn't baseless, I'd suggest providing sources that indicate significant coverage of this incident, because so far no one has done so. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:46, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

i certainly will, thank you for taking the time to respond and fixing up my request, i will add my argument and perhaps will see the future outcome.

just a quick question, to pass an article does not necessarily mean the decision with the most votes win but rather the decision with the most verifiable and notable sources arguments and facts? or am i mistaken Samyatilius (talk) 15:49, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

AfD is a consensus-based decision. It's not a straight vote, but based on strength of arguments. The presence of significant coverage in reliable sources is generally the best argument. In this case, JKP made a well-reasoned argument that there were no sources indicating significant coverage, and no one rebutted that. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:04, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

alright thanks for the info, that’s all Samyatilius (talk) 16:55, 18 August 2026 (UTC)