BETA SAÚDE
User talk:CNMall41
Texto da Wikipédia (en), licença CC BY-SA. O BETARUBI mostra o verbete inteiro nesta página — a leitura não continua fora do site.
| This is CNMall41's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 |
Ramayana
Here's an article about India's answer to the recently released Odyssey. Is that enough for you to consider it notable? Ramayana Part 1 will remain in the draftspace until it is well developed, and Part 2 will remain so for the same reasons as Draft:Avengers: Secret Wars. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:55, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- For me to consider it notable? Likely not as there are dozens of "entertainment desk" articles rehashing what is stated in the reference you gave. However, I care more about the bludgeoning of socks and UPE at this point so will defer notability to you if you feel it meets it. You will obviously need to unprotect the dozen or so titles in the name space if you decide to move it.--CNMall41 (talk) 05:01, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Kailash29792:, pinging to make sure you saw this. I wouldn't agree but also would NOT be objecting at this point if "you" moved it to the main space. I'm done fighting the socking and UPE so feel free to have at it.--CNMall41 (talk) 20:27, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
- I don't have any plans to expand Ramayana Part 1 or bring it to the mainspace because of my hectic work schedule. Moreover I favour editing Tamil cinema articles over Bollywood. But it's a pity there aren't many good Bollywood editors left like Krimuk2.0 (RIP). In fact, creating multiple drafts is often a symptom of the subject being denied mainspace entry a la War 2. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:16, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- You asked and I answered about notability but now you say you don't want to move it so that's a little strange to me. Either way, "denied entry" is notability and until notability changes then non-notable pages will be denied. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:01, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hats off to MNWiki845 for significantly improving the article. As the film is mere months away from release, please consider reassessing the draft. After all you previously said you would NOT be objecting at this point if "you" moved it to the main space. I do not want to move the draft if it is not officially (meaning by AfC standards) considered ready. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:19, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- To be clear, I won't have anything to do with that draft or that page. As stated on the draft, it is heavily riddled with SOCKS and UPE and those accounts have also been using volunteer editors as unknown pawns in the game. I am not going to assess it for notability and I am not going to move it to the mainspace. I am also not going to send it back to draft or recommend for deletion either. Hopefully that is clear. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Hats off to MNWiki845 for significantly improving the article. As the film is mere months away from release, please consider reassessing the draft. After all you previously said you would NOT be objecting at this point if "you" moved it to the main space. I do not want to move the draft if it is not officially (meaning by AfC standards) considered ready. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:19, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- You asked and I answered about notability but now you say you don't want to move it so that's a little strange to me. Either way, "denied entry" is notability and until notability changes then non-notable pages will be denied. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:01, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- I don't have any plans to expand Ramayana Part 1 or bring it to the mainspace because of my hectic work schedule. Moreover I favour editing Tamil cinema articles over Bollywood. But it's a pity there aren't many good Bollywood editors left like Krimuk2.0 (RIP). In fact, creating multiple drafts is often a symptom of the subject being denied mainspace entry a la War 2. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:16, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Arthurflemming88/sandbox

Hello, CNMall41. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:45, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Disruptive editing
Cast section in the article Jhanak has continuously been vandalized by this user AndySing1404. I explained him with maximum patience in his talk page and told him not to make cast section a mess. And told him not to lie in his edit summary. But he did the same thing today. Can you please take action against this? Rudrobio (talk) 16:03, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- @CNMall41: also he uses misleading edit summaries and used to say "Fixed Typo" but now saying "Added link".But all are actually adding excessive details to the cast section in different television articles. Rudrobio (talk) 07:30, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- @CNMall41: You also reverted his edits on Baatein Kuch Ankahee Si. Maybe a sock puppet or something. Rudrobio (talk) 21:34, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Wikipicked (talk) 04:32, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Discussion link Wikipicked (talk) 04:35, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Draft:Vishwanath & Sons
This movie releases tomorrow (14 August), the AfC needs to be cleared to avoid a Ponniyin Selvan: II-like fiasco. But someone else created the mainspace article Vishwanath & Sons which is at AfD, making matters worse for all. Kailash29792 (talk) 23:46, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
- Basically, UPEs coordinated it being bludgeoned into the mainspace. This is exactly why I chase these. I would AGREE that the draft is the one that needs to be in the mainspace and being that it releases tomorrow it likely meets NFF. Would you like me to opine at the AfD as such? If anything, the history needs merged so as to give credit to the creator of the draft. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:57, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
- Please do anything to avoid canvassing allegations. Though an IP tried to merge the draft content into the mainspace article, I maintain the same view: instantly delete the mainspace article and move the draft into it. Kailash29792 (talk) 00:15, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
Feedback Support (continued)
Originally posted as a reply to User talk:CNMall41/Archive 12#Feedback Support. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 18:29, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
The awards page you've recommended was useful! I've now reduced the awards as per the page, added the practice's involvement within the projects and removed the promotional text from the practice info in Draft:Gustafson Porter + Bowman. Could you please have a look and advise if it is up to standard? GP+B (talk) 18:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
AfC August Backlog Drive: Only ten days left!

Hi CNMall41, thanks for participating in the Articles for Creation August Backlog Drive! We've done amazing work so far, dropping the backlog by more than 3000 drafts already. We have around 1300 drafts outstanding, and we need your help to get that down to zero in the next 10 days. We can do this, but we need all hands on deck to help make it happen – if everyone who signed up to the drive reviewed just 1–2 drafts a day for the next ten days, we'd be down to zero in no time! A list of the pending drafts can be found at WP:AFCSORT, where you can select submissions in your area of interest, or you can find a random submission here. Thank you so much for your work so far, and happy reviewing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
New pages patrol September 2026 Backlog drive
| September 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
Open request on Certinia article
Hello CNMall41! I noticed that you were one of the most recent editors on the Certinia article. Discussion on an edit request of mine seems to have stalled, so I wanted to see if you would be interested in taking a look here. Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks! Mikeatcertinia (talk) 00:40, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

