BETA ZEN
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Visual arts
Texto da Wikipédia (en), licença CC BY-SA. O BETARUBI mostra o verbete inteiro nesta página — a leitura não continua fora do site.
| Related discussions: |
| The content of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Visual arts page was merged into Wikipedia:WikiProject Visual arts/Sources on 27 June 2026. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article, please see its history. |
| This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
|
| This WikiProject was featured on the WikiProject report at the Signpost on 4 June 2012. |
Honorific titles
Should a memorial include the honorific title like Dame or Lord before the name? APK hi :-) (talk) 09:05, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
- In what context? Probably, yes. Johnbod (talk) 17:41, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Johnbod: - Louisa Aldrich-Blake was a Dame and I'm writing about her memorial in London, so it should be "Dame Louisa Aldrich-Blake Memorial"? I wasn't sure because ones like the Victoria Memorial, London don't include "Queen" before it. I just noticed Sir William Glasgow Memorial so it looks like there's a precedent. APK hi :-) (talk) 03:21, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- Ok, I notice the memorial itself just has the DBE initials, rather than "Dame" out front. I'd guess don't use it here, but is there a WP:COMMONNAME ? Johnbod (talk) 03:29, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- I've seen it described different ways, but it's listed as "Memorial to Dame Louisa Aldrich Blake in Tavistock Square Gardens" by Historic England. APK hi :-) (talk) 03:55, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- Ok that's fairly official, so you could go either way (without the address). Johnbod (talk) 03:57, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you. APK hi :-) (talk) 04:12, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- Ok that's fairly official, so you could go either way (without the address). Johnbod (talk) 03:57, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- I've seen it described different ways, but it's listed as "Memorial to Dame Louisa Aldrich Blake in Tavistock Square Gardens" by Historic England. APK hi :-) (talk) 03:55, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Mark Nelson (Chicago artist)

The article Mark Nelson (Chicago artist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Tagged for notability concerns for 9 years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. Poorly sourced BLP. Created by a SPA, probably the subject himself.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 01:57, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
L'Estaque
Hi. The article on L'Estaque is currently very short, contains no sources, and provides very little information. Could someone please expand and improve it, perhaps using the corresponding French article at fr:L'Estaque as a starting point? I'm also posting this here because L'Estaque has a significant artistic heritage, having been closely associated with several major painters. Members of this project may also be able to expand the section on the Impressionist and Post-Impressionist painters associated with the area. ~2026-38797-63 (talk) 07:26, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
Why is "Hierarchy of genres" a low status article Visual Arts?
The hierarchy of genres greatly influenced Western art during the 18th and 19th centuries. Shouldn't it be rated of a HIGH rather than LOW importance within the Visual Arts project?
It is also in dire need of improvement on many levels. I have put in into my to-do bucket but not with a high priority as I am currently working on improving articles on paintings by J. M. W. Turner, who successfully challenged it during the first half of the 19th century with very smart tactics (see Snow Storm: Hannibal and his Army Crossing the Alps if you are curious as to how he did it).JP 21:36, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe#Requested move 23 July 2026

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe#Requested move 23 July 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ~2026-41076-10 (talk) 08:58, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Giuseppe Ricci#Requested move 25 July 2026

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Giuseppe Ricci#Requested move 25 July 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ~2026-41542-01 (talk) 10:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
There is a deletion request at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Lincoln (Bittinger)...
...which may be of interest to members of this Wikiproject. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:24, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Visual-art sourcing feedback requested on Draft:Yan Li
Hello, I have submitted Draft:Yan Li through Articles for Creation. I am the longtime partner of Yan Li's daughter and have disclosed this close personal connection on my user page.
The draft covers Yan Li's involvement with the Stars Art Group, his exhibitions in China and New York, contemporary art press coverage, and museum collections. I would be very grateful for comments from uninvolved visual-arts editors on the sourcing, neutrality, terminology, or scope of the visual-art material. I have also posted a general feedback request at WikiProject China. Thank you very much for taking the time to look at the draft and for any guidance you may be able to offer. YamazakiCask (talk) 00:18, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:The Magpie (Monet)#Requested move 1 August 2026

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:The Magpie (Monet)#Requested move 1 August 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ~2026-42470-60 (talk) 11:09, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:L.O.V.E. (sculpture)#Requested move 1 August 2026

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:L.O.V.E. (sculpture)#Requested move 1 August 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ~2026-42565-74 (talk) 23:25, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Cyclist (painting)#Requested move 1 August 2026

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Cyclist (painting)#Requested move 1 August 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ~2026-42565-74 (talk) 23:28, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Heinrich Thannhauser
There are inconsistent statements as to the date of his death. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:49, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
The location of artworks with multiple versions
I have come across a few cases of artwork series using Template:Infobox Artwork, which specifies a location with a city and a museum parameter. However, it is common for a series of artworks to end up in different places, like Sunflowers (Van Gogh series), Haystacks (Monet series), and Poplars (Monet series). It seems like we are currently just picking the location of one piece for the infobox arbitrarily, and now there's a minor edit war on Magdalene with the Smoking Flame. Is there a convention or guideline to this? LkL-70547 (talk) 20:08, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- If the infobox is causing a really serious problem it should just be dropped. I don't think MOS:ART deals with this exact point, although it encourages treating multiple castings etc, series or group of variants together in a single article. I hope I have sorted out the Magdalene carwreck, but if not, let's cut the box. Johnbod (talk) 23:42, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- This is what I advise: If the article is primarily about a single artwork, and the other versions are preparatory sketches or are otherwise less notable, then use the location for the main version. If the article is about a series where all works are notable as a whole or where all (or most) of the works are as notable as each other, then put the location in the description of the image instead of the infobox and consider not using an infobox.
- For example:
- Water Lilies (Monet series) is about the series as a whole, the article doesn't have an infobox, and each painting has its own location listed underneath of it and in the table that lists all of the paintings.
- A Modern Olympia is about a specific painting, which has its location listed in the infobox with the image. The other less notable sketches have their locations listed under the images individually.
- GranCavallo (talk) 02:28, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:The Magpie (Monet)#Requested move 1 August 2026

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:The Magpie (Monet)#Requested move 1 August 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Thanks! —1isall (talk | contribs) 01:57, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
Suggested move of Banquet of Jupille
There could be a move discussion at Talk:Banquet of Jupille#The Banquet of Jupille if others cared to join in (whether for or against). -- Hoary (talk)WWU 👍︎ 07:31, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
Seeking feedback for a peer review
Hello. Soliciting feedback from editors for an active peer review for Gustave Caillebotte's painting Paris Street; Rainy Day. Intending to bring this to FA, but believe the article's comprehensiveness is lacking for a featured article (especially on interpretive claims). Any and all help is welcome! dap 💅 02:45, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:La Zingarella#Requested move 25 August 2026

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:La Zingarella#Requested move 25 August 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ~2026-46213-07 (talk) 00:22, 25 August 2026 (UTC)
