Shushugah how do I create a page @Shushugah help

Welcome!

Hi MisinformationFreeUltimateTicTacToePage! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! Lynch44 11:53, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

Hello, I'm Jolielover. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Play School (Australian TV series), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page, which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Wikipedia does not typically have trivia, and regardless, all additional content must be sourced. jolielover♥talk 12:03, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Why has it been reverted? MisinformationFreeUltimateTicTacToePage (talk) 12:06, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

As I explained, 1) it must be sourced 2) Wikipedia very rarely hosts "trivia" like your edit. Please see the linked pages for more information. Thanks. jolielover♥talk 12:14, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Joyous!. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Bishop and knight checkmate seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 02:09, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Marta Aura, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. grokipedia is not considered a reliable source Jackjd0 (talk) 05:14, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Just noticing the other warnings and AFC declines, it seems like you may want to brush up on how to find and identify reliable sources. I'd strongly recommend reading through WP:RS, and then have a look at a few of the pages in See also sections Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Locating_reliable_sources and Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Essays. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:19, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fun Board Games for Family Gatherings, Great Games for Kids 8+, Includes 1 Board, 41 Mini X's, 40 Mini O's, 5 Large X's, 5 Large O's (July 27)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, DoubleGrazing, left the following feedback:

This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.

Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

• promotional language: see Words to watch;
• personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader;
• informal language.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Fun Board Games for Family Gatherings, Great Games for Kids 8+, Includes 1 Board, 41 Mini X's, 40 Mini O's, 5 Large X's, 5 Large O's to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:04, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, MisinformationFreeUltimateTicTacToePage! Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article. Need help? For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know. To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk. For peer support regarding all other editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a friendly question and answer hub for new editors. We'd love to see you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:04, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Fun Board Games for Family Gatherings, Great Games for Kids 8+, Includes 1 Board, 41 Mini X's, 40 Mini O's, 5 Large X's, 5 Large O's

The page Draft:Fun Board Games for Family Gatherings, Great Games for Kids 8+, Includes 1 Board, 41 Mini X's, 40 Mini O's, 5 Large X's, 5 Large O's has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:05, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ictoat (July 27)

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection

The reviewer, Significa liberdade, left the following feedback:

The subject does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion.

Next steps

• If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:32, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Please be more mindful about the internal linking guidelines

Hey, I’d recommend that you give MOS:LINK, and especially its section about over linking before continuing to add wiki links to articles. Your last two edits deviated significantly from this guidance: At Sons of God, the addition of a link to Root (linguistics) was good, but linking “bene elohim” to Beth Elohim is an error for multiple reasons. At Stone tool, you added multiple wiki links to common words, which is not appropriate. The only word that you linked there that isn’t totally inappropriate is the specialized term Knapping, although even then you made a mistake by linking it twice, rather than just the first time it appears in the article. As explained at the MOS pages I’ve directed you too, adding too many links to a page just causes link-blindness and does not help readers navigate the website. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:29, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Ok got it! I’ll read the article about linking and try not to make those mistakes again. MisinformationFreeUltimateTicTacToePage (talk) 00:33, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Learning lodge (July 28)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ScalarFactor, left the following feedback:

This draft does not include any sources or inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. You should also use inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement.

The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

You must place an inline citation directly after:

• quotations;
• any material whose verifiability is likely to be challenged or is contentious;
• any material about living people.

Learn how to create inline citations in the:

• Source Editor: Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup.
• VisualEditor: Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Learning lodge to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ScalarFactor (talk) 01:47, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Learning lodge (July 28)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Learning lodge to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:03, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

What is wrong with my references? Don’t they meet all 3 criteria? MisinformationFreeUltimateTicTacToePage (talk) 04:25, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Learning lodge (July 28)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Learning lodge to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:47, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

I did everything but you still denied my article? All my references met the criteria. MisinformationFreeUltimateTicTacToePage (talk) 04:56, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tic tac toe squared (July 28)

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection

The reviewer, DoubleGrazing, left the following feedback:

The subject does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion.

Next steps

• If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:46, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Why does it not meet the criteria? MisinformationFreeUltimateTicTacToePage (talk) 05:50, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Learning lodge (July 28)

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection

The reviewer, DoubleGrazing, left the following feedback:

The subject does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion.

Next steps

• If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:10, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Why doesn’t it meet the criteria? MisinformationFreeUltimateTicTacToePage (talk) 07:32, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

The topic fails WP:GNG. Writing new articles for Wikipedia is very difficult, to be honest. I've been here for the best part of 20 years and still would struggle to find a topic notable enough that isn't already covered. Why don't you spend the next few weeks editing existing articles first and trying to improve those? There are a lot of articles with barely any sources that you can help with. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:29, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

I’m not saying that he shouldn’t reject my articles. He has every right to. He just needs to tell me why he is rejecting them in the first place MisinformationFreeUltimateTicTacToePage (talk) 08:31, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Ref 1 is just a direct link to download the software, it is not WP:IS nor WP:RS. I have no idea what Ref 2 but it is not significant or detailed coverage on the topic either. There is also no indication that Ref 3 is a reliable, published source either. What we are looking for are significant coverage in news media (e.g. BBC News, Guardian, Reuters...) and/or in-depth reviews from independent publications (e.g. IGN, PC Gamer). It needs to be independent journalism with significant editorial oversight. None of the 3 references provided even come close to being significant, independent news coverage. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:39, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

He could have said that instead of auto banning all my articles. If double grazing told me that I would have been more then happy to replace the links MisinformationFreeUltimateTicTacToePage (talk) 08:50, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 09:21, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello MisinformationFreeUltimateTicTacToePage! The thread you created at the Teahouse, I need a 3rd opinion, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 1 August 2026 (UTC)