Beneficial shareholders

A beneficial shareholder is the person or legal entity that has the economic benefit of ownership of the shares.

Nominee shareholders

A nominee shareholder is the person or entity that is on the corporation's register of members as the owner, while in reality that person acts for the benefit or at the direction of the beneficial owner, whether disclosed or not.

A nominee shareholder relationship in most jurisdictions is governed by trust law, and therefore is simple and passive: generally, the nominee is not required to do anything except carry out specific (lawful) actions if so directed by the beneficiaries. In the event that a nominee becomes insolvent, the beneficial shareholder should not be affected as the nominee's creditors cannot take possession of the trust assets.

In some Asian jurisdictions, nominee shareholding is achieved through contract law and is very complex and risky. For example, in China under the Supreme Court rules, using a nominee shareholder is ineffective in preventing debt collection actions, as a nominee shareholder cannot escape liability for this on the grounds that they are not the beneficial owner. If a capital call is made and the beneficial owner omits to provide additional funding, the nominee shareholder is liable to fund the capital call using their own funds. Finally, shares held by a nominee shareholder can be inherited or subject to marital property division.^[3]

Ordinary shareholders

An individual or legal entity that owns ordinary shares of a company (in the United States commonly referred as common stock) is usually referred to as an ordinary shareholder. This type of shareholding is generally the most common. Ordinary shareholders have the right to influence decisions concerning the company by participating at general meetings of the company and in the election of directors and can file class action lawsuits, when warranted.^[4]

Preference shareholders

Preference shareholders are owners of preference shares (in the United States commonly referred as preferred stock). They are paid a fixed rate of dividend, which is paid in priority to the dividend to be paid to the ordinary shareholders. Preference shareholders usually do not have voting rights in the company.^[5]

Institutional shareholders

Institutional shareholders are organizations that own shares in companies on behalf of themselves or other investors. Common examples include pension funds, mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), insurance companies, hedge funds, sovereign wealth funds, and asset management firms. Because these institutions often manage large pools of capital, they may hold significant ownership stakes in publicly traded corporations.

Institutional shareholders can have greater influence over corporate governance than individual shareholders because of the size of their holdings. They may vote on the election of directors, executive compensation, mergers, shareholder proposals, and other matters submitted for shareholder approval. Large institutional investors may also communicate directly with company management and boards regarding issues such as corporate strategy, financial performance, governance practices, and risk management.

The degree of influence exercised by an institutional shareholder can depend on its investment strategy. Actively managed funds may buy or sell shares based on their assessment of a company's performance and may engage directly with management. Index funds and other passive investment funds, by contrast, generally seek to track a market index and may remain shareholders for long periods because they cannot easily sell individual companies without departing from the index they follow. As a result, voting and engagement can become particularly important tools for passive institutional investors.

Some asset managers exercise voting rights for shares held in funds on behalf of their clients. This can concentrate substantial voting power in a relatively small number of investment management firms even though the economic interests in the shares ultimately belong to many individual investors, pension beneficiaries, and other clients. The role of institutional shareholders has therefore become an important subject in discussions of corporate governance, shareholder activism, proxy voting, and the concentration of ownership and voting power in public companies.^[6]